What Did I Learn?

Webcomic Reviews by Delos Woodruff
 

Please note: This page is no longer updated.


New reviews are posted weekly on the blog page. These reviews are being slightyl updated and ported over to that blog to be republished every Wednesday. They are all scheduled to post and this page will remain until October 2009. You may wish to change your bookmarks.

The Surreal Adventures of Edgar Allan Poo



This is a comic by Dwight L Macpherson, art by Thomas Boatright and lettered by Thomas Mauer and hosted by Drunk Duck.

"Thank you for the wonderful review! We are sincerely happy you're enjoying the strip. ^_^"
-Dwight Macpherson



There are a number of things I enjoyed about this comic. First, the art is top-notch, full of expression and feeling. It's also very fitting for the material. It's got strong contrast with subtle textures and colors. The inkwork is very delicate in places but also very bold with smooth transitions.

I enjoy the writing and the dialogue too. It's not easy to write sharp yet freely flowing and character-natural speech.

Another nice touch are the comments below the comic. They are done in a way that compliments the comic and this nicely accentuates the whole work. It really rounds out the experience of reading the comic, as opposed to being a distraction.

What did I learn? For comics with a specific tone, a lot can be done to play it up and really make it something powerful. What's the comic really about? How can I build on it? Like what Disney did - now that we have something good here, how can we make it better? Mr. Macpherson and crew have done just that.

Look over the Surreal Adventures of Edgar Allan Poo and see if you don't agree.

 

Previous Reviews

 

Battlegate| Butterfly| Good Ship Chronicles| Evil, Inc.| Madscott| Jefbot| Chronicle| Sheldon| Stardrop| Theater Hopper| Knave| Lullaby| High Moon| Metadawn| Dead Days| PC Weenies| Ask Maridee | Tiny Folk | Gordian Algebra | Starslip Crisis | The Front | Coffee Time Comics | Patches | Little Creature | The Horrible Pirates | Serenity Tales | Crashlander | Girl Genius | This Is Me | Handle With Care | SuperFogeys | Copper | Eskimo Dave | Real Life | Chateau Wonderful | Count Your Sheep | Breakpoint City | Eeekeemo | Boxcar Astronaut | Zip and Li'l Bit | Wally & Osborne | Jump Leads | Dr. Sheep and the Aardvark | Station V3 | Dresden Codak | Lab Ratz | Toyzville | The Boids | Cow and Buffalo | Casey and Scotty | Just Outside | The Pretentious History of Everything | Tia's World | Quirks | Patrick Grey | For What It's Worth | The Sixth Dimension | Max and the Gorilla Goon Squad | Rainbow Orchid | Neko and Neko | Lions, Tigers and Bears | Spacequint | Lessons In Fire Safety | Corrupt Hardware | Enker's Tale | The Surreal Adventures of Edgar Allan Poo | A Rusty Life | You'll Have That | From the Margin | Jitterati

 
 
 

About These Reviews


I love comics and I'm always looking at how I can improve my own work by examining other creators' works. It's such a wildly diverse field that it's not advisable to make sweeping generalizations and ignore special circumstances and subjects.

There's a lot we can learn from one another. And while there are many forums where you might discuss this, I haven't found any lengthy discussion on what we can do to make our comics more successful. There are a few good books on the subject but the aspiring webcomic creator is forced to learn by sheer brute force practice how to adapt his/her personal style to the medium. This is not as efficient as it could be.

Also, there are literally thousands of webcomics but only a handful of places where you can find decent, regular reviews. The focus of my reviews will be on trying to determine what is positive, successful and worth emulating about each comic. You might even get hooked on a given comic you read about here.

You may also wonder where the 'criticism' is and where the negative things about the comics are pointed out. As a matter of fact, I did mention some dissappointing issues with layout and such in my initial reviews. I quickly came to the realization that it's easy for any viewer to know what they like and what they don't. I don't need to call extra attention to the negative. I have, on a few occasions, emailed a webcomic author with a few ideas for improvements but there's no need to make that information public.

I'm not trying to sugarcoat anything, mind you. I just wish to have an open discussion about what good comics do. Hopefully, more voices will join in.

 
 
 
ArtPatient.com

A little play on words about my never ending study and practice of art.

 
 

ArtPatient Site Map


Frog Pond Webcomic
Home
Hosted Galleries
News
Shop (offsite)
Tutorials and Resources
Webcomic Reviews

 
 
 

Refer This Page

 
Bookmark and Share
 
AddThis Feed Button
 
 
 

If you enjoy what you see here, please consider donating to help cover the site expenses. Thanks!

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Related Links

 

Comic Fencing
Rambling On
Webcomic Asylum
Pop Syndicate
Wednesday Webcomic Weview
Digital Strips
Julie at Online Comics
Webcomicworld