What Did I Learn?

Webcomic Reviews by Delos Woodruff
 

Please note: This page is no longer updated.


New reviews are posted weekly on the blog page. These reviews are being slightyl updated and ported over to that blog to be republished every Wednesday. They are all scheduled to post and this page will remain until October 2009. You may wish to change your bookmarks.

Jump Leads by Ben Paddon and JjAR.



Let's talk about the art first. The linework is interesting and the colors have a great contrast element to them. The characters are solidly designed and have good variety. Plus, the backgrounds evoke just the right feel for the science fiction setting. Fancy backgrounds are not the easiest thing to do when you have so little space to work with.

"Wow, I have to say, thank you for the fantastic review. You've really made my evening."



As of this writing, there are only seven episodes. Even so, you can clearly see that the comic is headed somewhere specfic. I can see that there's a plan which requires a certain pace of story in each episode. I'm waiting to see exactly where the story is going, but you can clearly see that the writing is strong. It has direction of action and builds momentum. Where are we being led?

Something else I found interesting was a discussion in the forums about what font to use. And after hearing the concerns, a change in font was made and retroactively applied. That's good customer service.

What did I learn?
Try some fancier backgrounds if it suits your comic. Keep the writing focused and strong. Respond and react to comments and suggestions. See for yourself at Jump Leads.

Next week's review: Wally and Osborne.
 

Previous Reviews

 

Battlegate| Butterfly| Good Ship Chronicles| Evil, Inc.| Madscott| Jefbot| Chronicle| Sheldon| Stardrop| Theater Hopper| Knave| Lullaby| High Moon| Metadawn| Dead Days| PC Weenies| Ask Maridee | Tiny Folk | Gordian Algebra | Starslip Crisis | The Front | Coffee Time Comics | Patches | Little Creature | The Horrible Pirates | Serenity Tales | Crashlander | Girl Genius | This Is Me | Handle With Care | SuperFogeys | Copper | Eskimo Dave | Real Life | Chateau Wonderful | Count Your Sheep | Breakpoint City | Eeekeemo | Boxcar Astronaut | Zip and Li'l Bit | Wally & Osborne | Jump Leads | Dr. Sheep and the Aardvark | Station V3 | Dresden Codak | Lab Ratz | Toyzville | The Boids | Cow and Buffalo | Casey and Scotty | Just Outside | The Pretentious History of Everything | Tia's World | Quirks | Patrick Grey | For What It's Worth | The Sixth Dimension | Max and the Gorilla Goon Squad | Rainbow Orchid | Neko and Neko | Lions, Tigers and Bears | Spacequint | Lessons In Fire Safety | Corrupt Hardware | Enker's Tale | The Surreal Adventures of Edgar Allan Poo | A Rusty Life | You'll Have That | From the Margin | Jitterati

 
 
 

About These Reviews


I love comics and I'm always looking at how I can improve my own work by examining other creators' works. It's such a wildly diverse field that it's not advisable to make sweeping generalizations and ignore special circumstances and subjects.

There's a lot we can learn from one another. And while there are many forums where you might discuss this, I haven't found any lengthy discussion on what we can do to make our comics more successful. There are a few good books on the subject but the aspiring webcomic creator is forced to learn by sheer brute force practice how to adapt his/her personal style to the medium. This is not as efficient as it could be.

Also, there are literally thousands of webcomics but only a handful of places where you can find decent, regular reviews. The focus of my reviews will be on trying to determine what is positive, successful and worth emulating about each comic. You might even get hooked on a given comic you read about here.

You may also wonder where the 'criticism' is and where the negative things about the comics are pointed out. As a matter of fact, I did mention some dissappointing issues with layout and such in my initial reviews. I quickly came to the realization that it's easy for any viewer to know what they like and what they don't. I don't need to call extra attention to the negative. I have, on a few occasions, emailed a webcomic author with a few ideas for improvements but there's no need to make that information public.

I'm not trying to sugarcoat anything, mind you. I just wish to have an open discussion about what good comics do. Hopefully, more voices will join in.

 
 
 
ArtPatient.com

A little play on words about my never ending study and practice of art.

 
 

ArtPatient Site Map


Frog Pond Webcomic
Home
Hosted Galleries
News
Shop (offsite)
Tutorials and Resources
Webcomic Reviews

 
 
 

Refer This Page

 
Bookmark and Share
 
AddThis Feed Button
 
 
 

If you enjoy what you see here, please consider donating to help cover the site expenses. Thanks!

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Related Links

 

Comic Fencing
Rambling On
Webcomic Asylum
Pop Syndicate
Wednesday Webcomic Weview
Digital Strips
Julie at Online Comics
Webcomicworld